Volver Al - Futuro Latino

In the 1960s and 70s, Latin American futurism was radical. Architects like Lina Bo Bardi and Oscar Niemeyer built concrete poems of possibility. Writers like Jorge Luis Borges and Julio Cortázar bent time like a Mobius strip. The future was a left-wing project: land reform, industrialization, and sovereignty.

We must leave behind the . The future cannot be built by digging up the earth for lithium to power Teslas. The future must be post-extractive : circular, bio-inspired, and small-scale. volver al futuro latino

Introduction: The Ghost of a Future That Never Came For most of the 20th century, Latin America was a laboratory of the future. From the futuristic utopias of Brasília (1960) to the cybernetic socialism of Salvador Allende’s Project Cybersyn (1971), the region dreamed in technicolor. Yet, by the turn of the millennium, that future seemed to have been cancelled. The narrative shifted: Latin America became a land of “eternal present,” a place of cyclical crises, informal economies, and magical realism—a genre that, as critics noted, stopped being magical when reality became too absurd to invent. In the 1960s and 70s, Latin American futurism was radical

We must leave behind the —the idea that faster is always better. The Latino future is slower, more deliberate. It values the sobremesa (the time after lunch) as much as the productivity metric. The future was a left-wing project: land reform,

is not about arriving. It is about the return to the path. It is the recognition that the future is not a destination in the Global North. It is a direction—a spiral—that starts right here, in the mud of the barrio , in the code of the hacker , in the rhythm of the candombe .

This is a future that is : not the end of history, but the reopening of history. It is pragmatic, messy, and local. It asks: How do we build a power grid that doesn’t collapse? How do we educate children for jobs that don’t exist yet, but which won’t be automated away because they are relational ? How do we build a democracy that works in the face of narcoviolence and climate collapse? Part V: The Uncomfortable Questions – What We Must Leave Behind Returning to the future requires sacrifice. We cannot take everything with us.