There is nothing in the OS/2 source that is technically inferior to Windows 3.1. In fact, OS/2’s crash recovery and memory protection were objectively superior. But Microsoft had better developer tools, cheaper licenses, and a ruthless focus on the desktop. IBM had mainframe culture. The source code proves it: OS/2 is a server in desktop clothing. Windows is a toy that grew up. The Ethical Gray Area Let’s address the elephant in the room: This source code is proprietary. It belongs to IBM (and maybe some bits still owned by Microsoft). Leaking it was almost certainly illegal. However, for a dead platform—one that hasn’t been commercially relevant in 25 years—the archival argument is strong.
That is, until recently, when the unthinkable happened: os 2 source code
OS/2 could run DOS, Windows 2.x, Windows 3.0 (badly), and OS/2 native apps. The source code shows thousands of lines of "shims" and "thunks" to make this work. Every line of compatibility code is a line that wasn’t spent improving the native API. Modern OSes (looking at you, Windows 11 and macOS) suffer from the exact same problem. There is nothing in the OS/2 source that