Do you have a vintage Catholic encyclopedia set? What’s the strangest or most fascinating page you’ve found? Disclaimer: This post is a historical and theological reflection based on the known structure and content of the 1967 New Catholic Encyclopedia (Volume 14, pages 290-310). It does not contain a direct reprint of the original text due to copyright but offers a commentary on its likely content and context.
This is fascinating because 1967 was a powder keg of hermeneutics. Dei Verbum (the Dogmatic Constitution on Divine Revelation) had just been promulgated two years prior. For the previous century, Catholic theology had been defensive—focused on the “deposit of faith” handed over as a neat package of propositions. But page 299 of this encyclopedia captures the shift mid-motion.
Flipping the Page on Vatican II: A Look at Volume 14, Page 299 (1967) new catholic encyclopedia -1967- volume 14 page 299
It reminds us that revelation isn't just something that happened 2,000 years ago. It is something happening on page 299 , every time we read with fresh eyes.
For those keeping score at home, Volume 14 covers the tail end of the alphabet. By the time you hit page 299, you have long since passed “Pope Pius XII” and are navigating the final theological frontiers before the index. Do you have a vintage Catholic encyclopedia set
The page discusses how Revelation is not merely a book dropped from heaven, but a living reality. It balances the Protestant Sola Scriptura with the Catholic Duo Fontes (two sources: Scripture and Tradition). But interestingly, writing in 1967, the author is already hedging. They acknowledge that Scripture and Tradition are not two separate "containers" of truth, but a single flowing stream.
Page 299 draws a sharp, pre-modernist line: The teaching authority of the Church (the Magisterium) does not sit above the Word of God, but serves it. For a mid-century Catholic, this was a crucial clarification against the charge that the Pope could just "make up" new dogmas. It does not contain a direct reprint of
Based on the structural mapping of the 1967 edition, page 299 falls within the critical entry on (specifically, the subsection on The Transmission of Divine Revelation ).
Do you have a vintage Catholic encyclopedia set? What’s the strangest or most fascinating page you’ve found? Disclaimer: This post is a historical and theological reflection based on the known structure and content of the 1967 New Catholic Encyclopedia (Volume 14, pages 290-310). It does not contain a direct reprint of the original text due to copyright but offers a commentary on its likely content and context.
This is fascinating because 1967 was a powder keg of hermeneutics. Dei Verbum (the Dogmatic Constitution on Divine Revelation) had just been promulgated two years prior. For the previous century, Catholic theology had been defensive—focused on the “deposit of faith” handed over as a neat package of propositions. But page 299 of this encyclopedia captures the shift mid-motion.
Flipping the Page on Vatican II: A Look at Volume 14, Page 299 (1967)
It reminds us that revelation isn't just something that happened 2,000 years ago. It is something happening on page 299 , every time we read with fresh eyes.
For those keeping score at home, Volume 14 covers the tail end of the alphabet. By the time you hit page 299, you have long since passed “Pope Pius XII” and are navigating the final theological frontiers before the index.
The page discusses how Revelation is not merely a book dropped from heaven, but a living reality. It balances the Protestant Sola Scriptura with the Catholic Duo Fontes (two sources: Scripture and Tradition). But interestingly, writing in 1967, the author is already hedging. They acknowledge that Scripture and Tradition are not two separate "containers" of truth, but a single flowing stream.
Page 299 draws a sharp, pre-modernist line: The teaching authority of the Church (the Magisterium) does not sit above the Word of God, but serves it. For a mid-century Catholic, this was a crucial clarification against the charge that the Pope could just "make up" new dogmas.
Based on the structural mapping of the 1967 edition, page 299 falls within the critical entry on (specifically, the subsection on The Transmission of Divine Revelation ).