This is a radical act. In conventional memoir (say, Nabokov’s Speak, Memory ), the author is the master of time. In Nada Se Opone A La Noche , time is a wound. Jodorowsky writes in fragments because his psyche is a fragment. He argues that the family is not a tree, but a rhizome—a tangled knot of repetition compulsion.
Nada Se Opone A La Noche is therefore a grimoire of healing. It rejects the therapeutic cliché of “closure.” There is no closure in Jodorowsky’s universe. There is only transparency . By making the secret visible, the secret loses its venom. Critics have accused Jodorowsky of narcissism and fabulism. Does he have the right to invent his mother’s psychosis? Is it ethical to turn his father’s misery into a Tarot card? These are valid questions. Jodorowsky’s response is essentially shamanic: The cure is more important than the record. Nada Se Opone A La Noche
But Jodorowsky rewrites geography. Tocopilla is not a town; it is a state of being. It is a landscape where God is absent and the void is tangible. He describes the desert not as a place of life, but as a “mineral agony.” In this environment, his ancestors become archetypes: the violent grandfather who throws his children into a pit of manure to “toughen them up”; the melancholic grandmother who speaks to ghosts; the father, Jaime, a man so consumed by the tyranny of petty commerce that he loses the ability to love. This is a radical act
In the final pages, Jodorowsky writes that his ancestors are not dead. They are sitting in the room with him, watching him write. They are hungry. They want to be seen. By writing this book, he feeds them. He gives them the attention the real world never did. Jodorowsky writes in fragments because his psyche is