DownloadsManuals, Application Videos & Software

Affairs Iii - Infernal

Picking up almost immediately after the shattering ending of the first film, we follow Inspector Lau Kin-ming (Andy Lau). Haunted by guilt and paranoia, he is now lauded as a hero for dismantling the triads, but he is living a lie. The story interweaves two timelines: the present day (roughly 2003) where Lau tries to bury his past as a mole, and a flashback to 1991, showing the uneasy partnership between Lau and the late gang boss Sam (Eric Tsang), as well as his first, chilling encounters with the unstable Superintendent Yeung (Leon Lai).

If you want more of the first film’s brilliant cat-and-mouse game, you’ll be disappointed. But if you want to see a masterful actor (Andy Lau) chart a man’s complete psychological collapse, and if you appreciate ambitious, if messy, storytelling, this is a solid and essential conclusion. It’s the Godfather Part III of the trilogy: flawed, overstuffed, and occasionally baffling, but unforgettable in its final, haunting moments. Infernal Affairs III

Leon Lai’s addition as Yeung is also a high point. He brings a quiet, unnerving stillness that perfectly counterpoints Lau’s frayed nerves. Is he internal affairs? A triad plant? A guardian angel? The ambiguity is the point, and Lai plays it with surgical precision. Picking up almost immediately after the shattering ending

This is where the trilogy shows its seams. Infernal Affairs III tries to do too much. The subplot involving a shady Chinese security officer (Chen Daoming) feels grafted on from a different, more political thriller. It muddies the water rather than deepening the mythos. Furthermore, the absence of the tight, propulsive editing of the first film is felt. Some scenes meander, and the emotional impact is diluted by the constant time-jumping. If you want more of the first film’s

The non-linear editing is ambitious. The film jumps between three time periods without hand-holding. For attentive viewers, this reveals clever parallels and tragic ironies. For casual viewers, it can feel frustratingly opaque. The film assumes you have the first two movies memorized. It rewards rewatching but punishes distraction.

Rating: ★★★½ (Solid/Very Good)

Picking up almost immediately after the shattering ending of the first film, we follow Inspector Lau Kin-ming (Andy Lau). Haunted by guilt and paranoia, he is now lauded as a hero for dismantling the triads, but he is living a lie. The story interweaves two timelines: the present day (roughly 2003) where Lau tries to bury his past as a mole, and a flashback to 1991, showing the uneasy partnership between Lau and the late gang boss Sam (Eric Tsang), as well as his first, chilling encounters with the unstable Superintendent Yeung (Leon Lai).

If you want more of the first film’s brilliant cat-and-mouse game, you’ll be disappointed. But if you want to see a masterful actor (Andy Lau) chart a man’s complete psychological collapse, and if you appreciate ambitious, if messy, storytelling, this is a solid and essential conclusion. It’s the Godfather Part III of the trilogy: flawed, overstuffed, and occasionally baffling, but unforgettable in its final, haunting moments.

Leon Lai’s addition as Yeung is also a high point. He brings a quiet, unnerving stillness that perfectly counterpoints Lau’s frayed nerves. Is he internal affairs? A triad plant? A guardian angel? The ambiguity is the point, and Lai plays it with surgical precision.

This is where the trilogy shows its seams. Infernal Affairs III tries to do too much. The subplot involving a shady Chinese security officer (Chen Daoming) feels grafted on from a different, more political thriller. It muddies the water rather than deepening the mythos. Furthermore, the absence of the tight, propulsive editing of the first film is felt. Some scenes meander, and the emotional impact is diluted by the constant time-jumping.

The non-linear editing is ambitious. The film jumps between three time periods without hand-holding. For attentive viewers, this reveals clever parallels and tragic ironies. For casual viewers, it can feel frustratingly opaque. The film assumes you have the first two movies memorized. It rewards rewatching but punishes distraction.

Rating: ★★★½ (Solid/Very Good)