While Death By China would be a passionate, well-footnoted, and terrifying read, it would also be deeply flawed—not because China poses no challenges, but because the framing of “death” and “confrontation” is strategically illiterate and morally hazardous.
Flaw 1: The Patient Is Not Dead – Interdependence Is Not Subjugation While Death By China would be a passionate,
The first “cause of death” would be economic. The book would argue that China has not risen through fair competition but through systematic predation: intellectual property theft, state-subsidized dumping, currency manipulation, and the use of forced technology transfer as a condition for market access. Using case studies—the collapse of U.S. solar panel manufacturing, the hollowing-out of European steel industries, the debt-trap diplomacy in Sri Lanka and Zambia—the author would claim that China’s state-capitalist model is an existential threat to market economies. The “death” here is the death of the liberal economic order, the WTO system, and the middle class of the Global North. Using case studies—the collapse of U