“I do not defend a client’s past,” he once told a Brazilian legal journal. “I defend their constitutional future.” Born in Rio de Janeiro in the early 1950s, Mariz de Oliveira came of age during the military dictatorship (1964–1985). Unlike many young lawyers who fled into corporate law or leftist activism, he chose criminal defense—at a time when political prisoners filled secret jails and habeas corpus was often a polite fiction. His early mentors were the old-guard trial lawyers who taught him to read a case file for its silences, not just its statements.
In the pantheon of Latin American jurisprudence, most lawyers strive for anonymity—quiet settlements, discreet contracts, invisible influence. Then there is the other kind: the advocate whose name becomes inseparable from the case itself, who walks into a courtroom and shifts the oxygen. Carlos Mariz de Oliveira Teixeira is the latter. For five decades, the Brazilian-born, internationally licensed attorney has built a career not out of winning popularity, but out of defending the indefensible. carlos mariz de oliveira teixeira .pdf
His office in São Paulo’s Jardins neighborhood is said to contain over 10,000 physical volumes of case law. He does not use social media. He gives interviews sparingly, and only in print. “I do not defend a client’s past,” he
He earned his law degree from the Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) and quickly added a master’s in criminal procedure from the Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Fluent in English, Spanish, and French, he also obtained a license to practice in Portugal, giving him a transatlantic reach rare among Brazilian litigators. By the late 1980s, he had co-founded the firm that would become Mariz de Oliveira & Sociedade de Advogados, known for taking cases that other firms refused—often on principle. His early mentors were the old-guard trial lawyers
By a contributing legal affairs writer
Mariz de Oliveira took the brief. His defense was characteristically procedural: he argued that the accusations relied on hearsay testimony from politically motivated witnesses and that the impeachment process violated due process rights. While Maia was ultimately acquitted in the criminal case (though he left the mayor’s office politically wounded), the defense strategy became a template—attack the source, not just the substance.
“Justice delayed is not justice denied,” he said after a 2021 hearing. “But it is justice wounded. I will not abandon the wound.” In a move that surprised many, Mariz de Oliveira agreed in 2022 to represent former president Jair Bolsonaro’s son, Carlos Bolsonaro, a Rio de Janeiro city councilman, in a case involving alleged digital militias and spying on political opponents. The younger Bolsonaro faced accusations of running a disinformation network. Mariz de Oliveira again leaned on procedural defenses—arguing that the investigation violated constitutional separation of powers.