Thus final: minimal area 0 as m→0, but triangle degenerates. For non-degenerate, no minimum, but if they ask for minimizing area among non-degenerate, it's arbitrarily small.
Actually my earlier derivative error: Let’s test numeric: m=1: t^2 coeff 2, -2t -35=0 → t = [2 ± √(4+280)]/4 = [2 ± √284]/4 ≈ (2±16.85)/4 → t1≈4.71, t2≈-3.71. Area=2 1 |4.71+3.71|=2 8.42=16.84. m=0.1: t coeff? (1+0.01)=1.01, -0.2t -35=0, Δ=0.04+141.4=141.44, √≈11.89, |t1-t2|=11.89/1.01≈11.77, Area=2 0.1*11.77≈2.35 — smaller. Yes, decreasing to 0. So indeed infimum 0. Apotemi Yayinlari Analitik Geometri
Set derivative ( g'(u) = 0 ): Numerator derivative: Let ( N = 576u^2 + 560u ), ( D = (1+u)^2 ). ( N' = 1152u + 560 ), ( D' = 2(1+u) ). ( g'(u) = \fracN' D - N D'D^2 = 0 \Rightarrow N' D = N D' ). Thus final: minimal area 0 as m→0, but
( |t_1 - t_2| = \frac\sqrt\Delta ), where ( \Delta = (-2m)^2 - 4(1+m^2)(-35) = 4m^2 + 140(1+m^2) = 4m^2 + 140 + 140m^2 = 144m^2 + 140 ). So ( |t_1 - t_2| = \frac\sqrt144m^2 + 1401+m^2 ). Thus [ \textArea(m) = 2m \cdot \frac\sqrt144m^2 + 1401+m^2. ] Area=2 1 |4